Archive for March, 2009

The Four Peaks Amethyst Mine - My Family Story

Thursday, March 12th, 2009

Being a native to Arizona, I thought it appropriate to share my own family history in the Phoenix area.  My story begins as a young girl in the booming Southwest,  well before the Arizona Cardinals, Indian gaming and massive urban sprawl.  Not really the wild west, but not according to my Great Aunt - Cecile Storer.

Cec owned the Four Peaks Amethyst mine twice in the 1960s and into the early 70s - long story but she always seemed to own pieces of the same property multiple times.  This mine is part of Four Peaks in the Mazatzal Range Northeast of Phoenix.  These peaks are prime hiking and can get you views of the entire Phoenix Metropolitan area, as well as several of the surrounding lakes.  Unfortunately, the smog has obstructed much of this view - but still pretty amazing.  The mine is below the fourth peak and a trick to get to, but as a child, fun to be in.  Now it is owned by a company that does still mine it, but the entrance is blocked with ‘No Tresspassing’ signs and barbed wire.  The Four Peaks Amethyst is a beautiful purple gem and one can be found in the Spanish crown.  It is also a gem that I never appreciated as a child since that is all I would get from Auntie Cec every Christmas and Birthday. 

Cec and her husband Al (you would never say Al and his wife Cec by the way) did much of the mining themselves and the only means to get the ore off the mountain was by mule or helicopter.  Or but unsuspecting hikers, which brings me to my anecdote, finally.

My Mom was sitting on a bench at Arizona State University on day in the 70’s when a few people sat near to her.  She overheard their conversation about taking a hike in Four Peaks and going to the amethyst mine.  They decided to explore the mine and came upon Auntie Cec with a rather large shot gun pointed at them.  Since they were trespassing, she demanded that they help her with a bit of mining.  Apparently, they were supposed to carry ore down the mountain, but I am not certain of the outcome since that is when my Mom, who was eavesdropping, butt in and pryed a bit.  Now I probably would have walked away but not my Mom. She actually admitted to these people that that was her Aunt that had been holding a shotgun to them!  Then again, why not admit the relation.  Auntie Cec passed away worth several million $ because of her strength and business sense - and possibly by getting free labor from unsuspecting hikers.  She was a very strong woman who was audited by the IRS almost annually since they couldn’t figure out how she got her money.  They rarely, if ever, found any wrong doing.

Next installment of my family history…my relative who was tried for treason in the late 1700s for counterfeiting.

Selecting the Proper Hiking Shoe

Tuesday, March 10th, 2009

Your hiking shoes are the most important piece of backpacking equipment.  A poor pair of shoes can make an otherwise great trip completely miserable.  A good pair of shoes helps prevent blisters, gives foot and ankle support, helps prevent knee pain and keeps the most valuable tool for a hike (your feet) comfortable. 

Here are a few FAQs and answers that will hopefully help you select some shoes for your next backpacking trip.

Do I need to purchase new shoes? While having shoes that are already broken in is ideal, backpacking shoes that are lacking good tread, cushion and support would make a better rear view mirror accessory.  Also, consider the age of your shoes.  I once had a guest on one of my trips I led through the Grand Canyon that had shoes that were rarely worn, but broken in.  The problem?  They were so old that the glue holding the soles on the shoes was old and worn out.  Let’s just say duct tape is an amazing invention!

Should I get leather or synthetic?  This depends on where you are hiking.  Synthetic shoes that can breath and are light are best for warm/hot weather hiking - such as the Grand Canyon April through October.  Full leather boots are best for your cold weather/snowy hikes.

Should I get high or low cut?  This can also depend on where you are hiking but the determining factor should be comfort.  High cut boots don’t always work for every foot, but do provide a little extra ankle support.  If you are like me, I can’t wear a high cut shoe since every pair I have ever tried cuts into my Achilles Tendon.  If you need the ankle support, a low cut shoe with a sturdy foot bed will give ample support. 

Here are a few more tips when purchasing shoes…

  • Go shopping in the afternoon/evening when your feet are the most swollen and be sure to have your foot measured.
  • Try on your shoes with the same socks you will be wearing with your shoes.  I recommend finding a good hiking sock and then buying several pairs of the same sock.  It is best to break in your shoes with the same socks you will be hiking in and change into the same socks throughout your trip.  Your feet will not like any surprises during long trips.  This will help prevent blisters; as will salve or GLIDE, sock liners and/or synthetic materials.  SmartWool makes a great hiking sock.
  • Try to walk on an incline and decline when truing on your shoes.  I recommend buying a 1/2 size bigger than your normal size to give ample space in the toe box; but not so big that your heel rubs.
  • Test the support of the shoe.  Take the shoe by the toe and heel and twist like you would a wash cloth when ringing out the water.  If the shoe easily rolls up like a ball (try with a running shoe and see it rollup), then you won’t have enough support for rocks and uneven terrain.  If the shoe is rigid and resists your twisting it (it will move, just not as easily), then it should provide proper support.

If you have any questions that should be added to the FAQs, respond to the blog and I will try to get them asnwered for you.

Cement Plant Causes Pollution Concern For The Grand Canyon

Wednesday, March 4th, 2009

A proposed cement plant the the town of Seligman, Arizona has raised air pollution concerns for the Grand Canyon. The cement conglomerate Cemex has proposed the plant be built 15 miles Seligman which puts the plant’s location within 50 miles of the South Rim of the Canyon.

View From Shoshone Point, Grand Canyon National Park

View From Shoshone Point, Grand Canyon

Economically, the plant makes sense for the area. Seligman is an Historic Route 66 town that is known for it’s kitschy souvenir shops and 50’s style eateries. We pass through there on the way to the trailhead on our Havasupai Tours and our we love to stop at West Side Lilo’s or the Snow Cap after we have spent 3 or 4 days at Havasupai. The area is in need of a economic boost since there isn’t much in the way of employment opportunities in that part of the state.  The construction of the plant will bring 700 construction jobs and 110 permanent jobs to the area. For reference, the total population of Seligman is only 456 people. Arizona also has a need for concrete with expected demand of 6 million tons a year for the next dozen years.

Environmentally, the plant will very likely cause damage to the area including the Grand Canyon National Park. The park has already been experiencing problems with air quality due to the emissions from Phoenix and Las Vegas. The effect has been diminished visibility over the years with a haze forming over the canyon due to this pollution. Having a potential source of pollution so close to the canyon will only increase the problem.  Maybe I should give Cemex the benefit of the doubt that they will build a plant that will be zero emissions but that won’t be enough. There is the issue that the plant will create additional auto traffic in and out of the area and the harmful emissions those vehicles will create. The National Park service implemented a shuttle service last year that brings some of the canyon’s 4 million visitors in and out of the park in order to cut down on vehicle emissions in the park so air quality is obviously an issue.

I wish that Cemex would find another area of the state to build it’s plant.  I know that progress has to happen but we need to be extra careful when growth is planned around our national treasures.

Via: AZ Central

My Thoughts on ” A Walk In The Woods”

Monday, March 2nd, 2009

For all of you die hard hikers out there, please don’t think any less of me because it only took me 10 years to get around to reading this book.  I did a Google search and found other blog entries from slow pokes like me (Ray) so I know I’m not totally alone on this.  Anyway, like a good blogger because I have read the book I must now do my best to force my thoughts about the book upon you.

This entry is not going to be another book review about “A Walk in the Woods”. Many other highly qualified individuals have already done that.  My thoughts are about what wasn’t in the book.

A Walk in the Woods

A Walk in the Woods

Don’t get me wrong, the book was a good read and Bryson’s writing style made the book easy and fun but its not my job to write a thousand words about why I liked the book. Just realize that I liked the book and would recommend it to a friend. That’s the end of my unofficial book review.

The aspect of “A Walk in the Woods” that I feel is worth mentioning is that Bill Bryson and Katz covered a good chunk of the trail together but yet we only get to hear about a handful of the other hikers they met along the way.  This seemed odd to me. Although the Appalachian Trail (AT for short) is not a superhighway of hikers (Bryson has a good explanation of this in the book), there are about 2,000 hikers a year that are attempting this feat so there is bound to be more interaction with other hikers than what we read in the book. 

I’ve met a few AT through hikers and hiked with some on the tours I’ve lead and they tell about the real sense of community on the trail. Through hikers will hike sections of the trail with fellow through hikers, people meet up at night around shelters and share stories, and each through hiker has a trail name which is a nickname you use on the trail. We never even found out Bill and Katz’s trail name in the book. Are they embarrassed by their names or were they intentionally left out for fear of retribution from Mary Ellen?

From what I know of the AT and through hikers, it just seemed to me that there were some other stories that Bryson was ready to tell us but either he took the poetic license to keep them out of the book or his editors told him to leave them out. Come on Bill, that can’t be all there was to your AT adventure. Tell us more!

 

Send Me
Dirt-e-mail

Keep the adventure going!
Sign up to receive bi-monthly e-mail updates on the latest happenings, newly added tours, outdoors tips and more.
 

Tell Someone to
Go Take a Hike

Good things are meant to be shared!
Tell a friend or family member about the adventures that await you.
 

Photo Gallery

Much better than Aunt Selma and Aunt Patty's vacation slide shows, but not as good as being there. Click here...
 
Bookmark: